The Evidential Argument from Evil
(eBook)

Grouping Information

Book Cover Information

Hoopla Extract Information

stdClass Object
(
    [year] => 2008
    [artist] => William L. Rowe
    [fiction] => 
    [coverImageUrl] => https://cover.hoopladigital.com/opr_9780253114099_270.jpeg
    [titleId] => 13285134
    [isbn] => 9780253114099
    [abridged] => 
    [language] => ENGLISH
    [profanity] => 
    [title] => The Evidential Argument from Evil
    [demo] => 
    [segments] => Array
        (
        )

    [pages] => 380
    [children] => 
    [artists] => Array
        (
            [0] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [name] => William L. Rowe
                    [artistFormal] => Rowe, William L.
                    [relationship] => AUTHOR
                )

            [1] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [name] => Paul Draper
                    [artistFormal] => Draper, Paul
                    [relationship] => AUTHOR
                )

            [2] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [name] => Richard Swinburne
                    [artistFormal] => Swinburne, Richard
                    [relationship] => AUTHOR
                )

        )

    [genres] => Array
        (
            [0] => Philosophy
            [1] => Religion
        )

    [price] => 3.99
    [id] => 13285134
    [edited] => 
    [kind] => EBOOK
    [active] => 1
    [upc] => 
    [synopsis] => Is evil evidence against the existence of God? Even if God and evil are compatible, it remains hotly contested whether evil renders belief in God unreasonable. The Evidential Argument from Evil presents five classic statements on this issue by eminent philosophers and theologians and places them in dialogue with eleven original essays reflecting new thinking by these and other scholars. The volume focuses on two versions of the argument. The first affirms that there is no reason for God to permit either certain specific horrors or the variety and profusion of undeserved suffering. The second asserts that pleasure and pain, given their biological role, are better explained by hypotheses other than theism.

Contributors include William P. Alston, Paul Draper, Richard M. Gale, Daniel Howard-Snyder, Alvin Plantinga, William L. Rowe, Bruce Russell, Eleonore Stump, Richard G. Swinburne, Peter van Inwagen, and Stephen John Wykstra.
    [url] => https://www.hoopladigital.com/title/13285134
    [pa] => 
    [series] => Indiana in the Philosophy of Religion
    [publisher] => Indiana University Press
    [purchaseModel] => INSTANT
)